Please vote for us, we need your support to continue offering such tools and services!

English
View all polls

Reward Vote

rewardvote by alanonestars 12-May-2019 09:17:07 UTC referendum-v1

Poll status

2,015,577 EOS voted
Vote

You voted {{(lastVote==1)?'YES':'NO'}}  

{{votingResponse.message}}

Post a public comment (optional)

Select Yes/No to cast your vote and make your comment public on the EOS blockchain. Your comment and vote will be recorded on-chain for ever, if you want to change your comment please vote again and our algorithm will attempt to just show your latest comment.

Account
{{ webdigiWallet.account.account_name}}

  • 131 accounts
  • 38 days since poll started
  • 0.19% participation
  • 8% YES lead over NO

I feel that rewarding voters is a key element because on the hierarchy of things voter are senior to almost everything in the platform, voters get to decide the BPs who then get to decide things and who make the blocks so it make sense to give them (the voters) something. For this proposal I think that 1% of annual inflation should be given directly to voters.





Time Frame:








4 Comments

These comments were made along with their vote

Sort by...
  • transhumanio (Voted: Yes) 2 days ago

    I agree with partially distributing a fraction of the 4% annual inflation to token holders as a small incentive to stake their holdings. However, perhaps scale this towards small token holders (i.e. larger token holders receives less incentive) to encourage more small holders to vote to counter whale votes. If not scaled, whales would effectively accumulate well above a small "incentive" level of the inflation share, while small token holders would receive a less significant amount that would not be enough to entice them to stake and to vote. In summary, Scale inflation distribution to: 1) EOS tokens (Log Scale with rapid decay above 40k EOS) 2) Vote Decay (to encourage regular voting)

  • snwczzr12345 (Voted: No) 1 month ago

    选民也是持币者，本身就有厉害关系。增加选民的福利，也会给短期投机者钻空子

  • theangelwave (Voted: No) 1 month ago

    Voters/token holders are in a sense owners of the business (EOS network) . Nowhere are owners directly compensated for improving their business. Owners compensation would always been in profit and higher asset (EOS token) value

  • superoneioaa (Voted: Yes) 1 month ago

    Good

Load more comments

Related Polls

POLL AT 2.22%
Referendum

Should EOS tokens sent to eosio.ramfee and eosio.names accounts in the future be allocated to REX?

Question Should future EOS tokens sent to eosio.ramfee and eosio.names accounts be allocated to REX? Method To do this, the Block Producers will have to set CHANNEL_RAM_AND_NAMEBID_FEES_TO_REX = 1 (https://github.com/EOSIO/eosio.contracts/blob/44d53447e04cb9fc32e1a73aacb7119511363a29/contracts/eosio.system/include/eosio.system/eosio.system.hpp#L23) Background Information The EOS Resource Exchange (REX) enables token holders to lend/borrow CPU and NET resources. One of the features of REX is that it can also distribute EOS fees paid into system accounts, eosio.ramfee and eosio.names, on top of the fees paid by those borrowing the resources. eosio.ramfee account: This account holds the 0.5% fee paid for all RAM purchases and sales on EOS. eosio.names account: This account holds all EOS paid for short names (e.g. ".eos") each day in the shortname auction Original Announcement of REX from Dan Larimer: https://medium.com/@bytemaster/proposal-for-eos-resource-renting-rent-distribution-9afe8fb3883a Additional notes The addition of these funds would not increase inflation nor effect the 4% inflation allocated to the eosio.saving. The current funds in both accounts in question would not be touched, only future tokens that enter the accounts would be reallocated into REX.

22,967,355 EOS voted 99.2%0.8%
POLL AT 2.1%
Referendum

Delete Eos Core Arbitration Forum ?

Would EOS be better off if ECAF would not be able to issue key switching orders and we would rather rely on the code and block producers 15 out of 21 multisig?

21,672,149 EOS voted 98.5%1.5%